Abstract
Leveraging three environmental regulatory changes as quasi-natural experiments, and employing difference-in-differences models, we find robust evidence that stringent environmental regulations increase workplace safety violations across all experimental settings. This effect is primarily due to financial constraints and operational adjustments required for compliance, with their interaction further intensifying the effect. The adverse impact is more pronounced when stakeholders heighten their focus on environmental issues and when product market competitiveness is intense. Our findings reveal a significant unintended consequence of climate policies, underscoring a critical trade-off between environmental and social dimensions of ESG.